THE BLACK DAY FOR INDIAN JUDICIARY 

38 Years in Prison. Innocent. Acquitted. Too Late for Justice.

The acquittal of three men by the Allahabad High Court after 38 long years of life imprisonment in a so-called “blind murder” case is not a moment of relief—it is a moment of national shame.

Strong Views by Dr. Anthony Raju

Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Chairman, Indian National Human Rights Protection Council

Voice of the Voiceless People

“This judgment is a tragic reminder that justice delayed for 38 years is justice denied forever.”

For nearly four decades, innocent citizens were stripped of liberty, dignity, family, livelihood, and health—not by criminals, but by systemic failure. The High Court has now acknowledged what should never have been allowed to happen: the deceased was murdered by someone else, and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

“An acquittal after 38 years is not justice—it is a post-mortem of a broken process.”

This case exposes grave defects in investigation, appreciation of evidence, and trial adjudication.

Convictions founded on conjecture, unresolved contradictions, and mechanical reasoning destroy lives and erode public faith in the Rule of Law.

“The Constitution’s promise under Article 21—life, liberty, and dignity—was reduced to paper.”

Questions the Nation Must Confront

Who will answer for the 38 stolen years of these innocent men?

Who is accountable for a blind investigation and flawed prosecution?

Why were contradictions in evidence ignored at the trial stage?

How many innocents remain imprisoned in similar cases across India?

Will the State offer meaningful compensation, rehabilitation, and a public apology?

What institutional reforms will ensure this never happens again?

When will official accountability replace ceremonial regret?

The Demand

“Acquittal is not enough. Accountability is mandatory.”

Dr. Anthony Raju calls for:

Independent scrutiny of the original investigation and prosecution

Exemplary compensation and comprehensive rehabilitation for the victims

Time-bound reforms in policing, prosecution standards, and trial oversight

Personal accountability where negligence and abuse are established

#TheBlackDayForIndianJudiciary

#JusticeDelayedJusticeDenied

#WrongfulConviction

#38YearsLost

#HumanRightsViolation

#Article21

#JudicialAccountability

#PoliceAndProsecutionReforms

#VoiceOfTheVoiceless

#RuleOfLawInCrisis #dranthonyraju #AICHLS #NCNB 

https://www.deccanherald.com/india/uttar-pradesh/blind-murder-allahabad-high-court-acquits-three-men-serving-life-sentence-for-38-years-3847899

Ex-MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar to Remain in Jail: Supreme Court Stays Bail in Unnao Rape Case

New Delhi: In a decisive and victim-centric order, the Supreme Court of India on Monday stayed the Delhi High Court’s order granting interim bail to former Uttar Pradesh MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the infamous 2017 Unnao rape case, thereby ensuring that he will continue to remain in judicial custody.

A three-judge vacation bench headed by Justice Surya Kant and comprising Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Augustine George Masih passed the interim stay while hearing a petition filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which had challenged the High Court’s decision to suspend Sengar’s life sentence.

Survivor Allowed to Intervene

In a significant development reaffirming the primacy of victims’ rights, the Supreme Court also allowed the Unnao rape survivor to intervene in the proceedings, enabling her to present her case and concerns directly before the apex court.

The Court’s intervention underscores its commitment to safeguarding the dignity, safety, and legal rights of survivors of sexual violence—especially in cases involving influential convicts.

Background of the Case

Kuldeep Singh Sengar, a former MLA, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape of a minor in Unnao, Uttar Pradesh. The case had drawn nationwide outrage due to the abuse of political power, repeated threats to the survivor and her family, and the tragic death of her father while in custody.

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had ordered the suspension of Sengar’s sentence on certain legal grounds, which prompted sharp criticism and led the CBI to approach the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court’s Message

By staying the High Court’s order, the Supreme Court has sent a clear message:

Convicted offenders in heinous crimes cannot be granted liberty lightly,
Victims’ voices must be heard at every stage, and
The rule of law prevails over political influence.
The matter will now be heard in detail by the Supreme Court on the merits of the appeal.

Why This Order Matters

Reinforces zero tolerance toward sexual crimes
Strengthens victim participation in criminal justice
Upholds public confidence in constitutional courts
The case continues to remain a critical benchmark for accountability, justice, and human rights in India’s criminal justice system.

Tags:
#UnnaoRapeCase #SupremeCourt #JusticeSuryaKant #VictimsRights #RuleOfLaw #CBI #GenderJustice #HumanRights #dranthonyraju #toppocsoexpert #pocso #rape #humanrightscommission #humanreightscommissionofindia #nhrc #ncnb

Broad Legal Explanation

By Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Leading Expert in POCSO, Rape & Dowry Death Cases

The recent decision of the Delhi High Court suspending the life sentence of Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the Unnao rape case raises grave constitutional, criminal, and human rights concerns. From a victim-centric and rule-of-law perspective, the order appears legally fragile and deeply problematic.

1. Hyper-Technical Interpretation vs. Substantive Justice

The suspension rests primarily on a narrow, textual reading that a sitting MLA does not qualify as a “public servant” under Section 21 IPC, thereby excluding the aggravated offence provisions under Section 5(c) of the POCSO Act and Section 376(2) IPC.

Even if this technical view is accepted arguendo, it does not dismantle the core finding of guilt for penetrative sexual assault of a minor under Sections 3/4 POCSO—an offence independently punishable with life imprisonment. Substantive justice cannot be eclipsed by classificatory semantics.

2. Life Imprisonment: Suspension Is an Exception, Not a Norm

Settled Supreme Court jurisprudence holds that once a person is convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment, the presumption of innocence no longer survives. Suspension of such a sentence is permissible only when a palpable, gross, and fatal error in the trial judgment is demonstrated—suggesting a high likelihood of acquittal.

Here, the High Court did not record any prima facie finding that conviction under Sections 3/4 POCSO is unsustainable. Absence of such a finding makes suspension legally untenable.

3. Ignoring Gravity of Offence and Abuse of Power

This case is not routine. It involved:

A minor victim,

Entrenched abuse of political power, and

A documented pattern of intimidation.

The survivor’s father died after custodial assault; family members faced persistent threats; the prosecution was set in motion only after extraordinary public protest; and the Supreme Court itself had to transfer the trial due to concerns about safety and fairness. Any bail or suspension analysis that sidelines these realities undermines the criminal justice system’s duty to protect the vulnerable.

4. Misplaced Reliance on “Minimum Sentence Served”

The reasoning that relief could be granted because the convict has already undergone the minimum sentence under Section 4 POCSO is deeply flawed. The statute clearly authorizes life imprisonment for penetrative sexual assault of a child. Treating the minimum as the ceiling distorts legislative intent and trivializes the offence.

5. Victim Protection Is Central to Bail Jurisprudence

Courts are bound to assess the risk to the survivor and witnesses. The history of intimidation in this case is undisputed. Dismissing such risks by presuming perfect policing ignores lived realities and contradicts binding precedent that places victim safety at the heart of sentencing and suspension decisions.

6. Constitutional Ethos and Public Confidence

Sexual offences against children implicate Article 21—the right to life with dignity. Orders that appear to dilute accountability in cases involving extreme gravity, power asymmetry, and prior obstruction of justice erode public confidence and send a dangerous message to survivors nationwide.

Conclusion

From a constitutional, statutory, and human rights standpoint, the suspension of sentence in this case reflects a hyper-technical approach divorced from ground realities. Courts must ensure that technical interpretations do not defeat the object of protective laws like POCSO, nor overshadow the gravity of offences and the lived trauma of survivors.

Justice must be seen not only in text, but in impact.

Justice cannot be reduced to wordplay when a child’s dignity, life, and safety are at stake.

Courts must ensure that law protects the vulnerable, not comforts the powerful.

#JusticeForUnnaoSurvivor

#POCSOJustice

#ChildSafetyFirst

#NoMercyForChildRapists

#LifeImprisonmentMeansLife

#RuleOfLawAbovePower

DR. A. P. J. ABDUL KALAM WORLD PEACE AWARD

The Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam World Peace Award stands as a powerful global symbol of peace, humanity, ethical leadership, and universal brotherhood—values lived and preached by the great visionary, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, the People’s President of India.

This prestigious international award is hosted by one of the most reputed Human Rights organizations of India, with active operations and humanitarian outreach in over 140 countries worldwide, working relentlessly for the protection of human dignity, peace, justice, and fundamental freedoms across nations.

Under the unshaken, visionary, and courageous leadership of Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Chairman, Indian National Human Rights Protection Council, the organization has emerged as a globally respected moral force in the field of human rights advocacy and peace-building.

Dr. Anthony Raju is a world-renowned human rights defender, widely respected in India and internationally for his fearless commitment to justice, constitutional values, and the protection of the oppressed, marginalised, and voiceless. His leadership reflects the very ideals that Dr. Kalam embodied—truth, compassion, courage, integrity, and service to humanity.

The Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam World Peace Award honours individuals and institutions who have made extraordinary contributions toward:

Promotion of world peace and harmony

Protection of human rights and civil liberties

Advancement of social justice and constitutional values

Service to humanity beyond borders, religion, caste, or nationality

This award is not merely a recognition—it is a global call to conscience, inspiring leaders, youth, institutions, and nations to rise above hatred, violence, and division, and work collectively for a peaceful, just, and humane world.

Peace is not an option. Peace is a responsibility.

Humanity is not a choice. It is a duty.

STRONG HASHTAGS

#DrAPJAbdulKalamWorldPeaceAward

#WorldPeace

#HumanRights

#GlobalPeaceMovement

#PeaceAndJustice

#HumanityFirst

#IndianNationalHumanRightsProtectionCouncil

#DrAnthonyRaju

#SupremeCourtAdvocate

#HumanRightsDefender

#JusticeWithoutBorders

#PeaceForHumanity

कानूनी नोट (Legal Note)

POCSO Act, 2012 बच्चों की सुरक्षा के लिए बनाया गया एक सख़्त क़ानून है, लेकिन व्यावहारिक अनुभव यह भी बताता है कि कई मामलों में झूठे, मनगढ़ंत या दुर्भावनापूर्ण आरोप लगाए जाते हैं। ऐसे मामलों में क़ानून के भीतर रहकर मज़बूत और संवैधानिक बचाव संभव है।

डॉ. एंथनी राजू के अनुसार प्रमुख बचाव बिंदु:

1. FIR की कानूनी जांच

FIR में देरी, विरोधाभास, या असंभव आरोप झूठे केस की पहली पहचान हो सकते हैं।

2. पीड़िता/शिकायतकर्ता के बयान का विश्लेषण

धारा 161 व 164 CrPC के बयानों में अंतर, विरोधाभास या अतिशयोक्ति बचाव का मज़बूत आधार बनते हैं।

3. मेडिकल और फॉरेंसिक साक्ष्य

मेडिकल रिपोर्ट यदि आरोपों का समर्थन नहीं करती, तो अभियोजन का केस कमज़ोर हो जाता है।

4. आयु (Age Determination) की वैधानिक जांच

कई मामलों में उम्र को ग़लत दर्शाया जाता है। स्कूल रिकॉर्ड, जन्म प्रमाण पत्र और मेडिकल बोर्ड की रिपोर्ट निर्णायक होती है।

5. चार्जशीट को चुनौती

यदि चार्जशीट बिना ठोस सबूत, यांत्रिक ढंग से या क़ानून के उल्लंघन में दायर की गई है, तो उसे हाई कोर्ट में चुनौती दी जा सकती है।

6. धारा 482 CrPC / Article 226

झूठे और दुर्भावनापूर्ण POCSO मामलों में FIR/चार्जशीट को रद्द (Quash) कराने का संवैधानिक अधिकार उपलब्ध है।

7. न्यायालय का दृष्टिकोण

सुप्रीम कोर्ट व हाई कोर्ट ने बार-बार कहा है कि

“POCSO Act का दुरुपयोग निर्दोष व्यक्तियों को फँसाने के लिए नहीं किया जा सकता।”

---

डॉ. एंथनी राजू का स्पष्ट मत

> “क़ानून का उद्देश्य संरक्षण है, प्रताड़ना नहीं।

झूठे पॉक्सो मामलों में तथ्यों, सबूतों और संवैधानिक अधिकारों के आधार पर मज़बूत बचाव न केवल संभव है, बल्कि न्याय का तक़ाज़ा भी है।”

---

DISCLAIMER (अस्वीकरण)

यह सामग्री केवल सामान्य कानूनी जानकारी और जन-जागरूकता के उद्देश्य से है। यह कानूनी सलाह (Legal Advice) नहीं है। प्रत्येक मामला अपने तथ्यों पर निर्भर करता है। किसी भी क़ानूनी कार्रवाई से पहले योग्य अधिवक्ता से परामर्श अनिवार्य है।

---

Hashtags

#FalsePOCSOCase

#POCSOLaw

#LegalDefense

#CriminalJustice

#SupremeCourtAdvocate

#DrAnthonyRaju

#JusticeForInnocent

#RuleOfLaw

#LegalAwareness

#humanrightscommission

#humanrightscouncilofindia

#humanrightscommissionofindia

Allahabad High Court Acknowledges Financial Hardships of Young Lawyers in District Courts

In a significant and reality based observation, the Allahabad High Court has acknowledged that lawyers at the initial stage of practice in District Courts struggle to earn sufficient and stable income. The Court took judicial notice of the harsh economic realities faced by junior advocates whose earnings remain uncertain irregular and often inadequate to meet even basic livelihood requirements.

In the matter of Sri Hiralal versus State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, the Bench of Justice Madan Pal Singh observed that newly practising lawyers may earn only three hundred to four hundred rupees on some days and nothing on others making it unjust to assume financial stability at the nascent stage of legal practice. Consequently the High Court modified the Family Court order and reduced the maintenance amount from five thousand rupees to three thousand seven hundred and fifty rupees per month thereby aligning judicial expectations with practical realities.

Views of Dr Anthony Raju Advocate Supreme Court of India

Dr Anthony Raju Advocate Supreme Court of India and an internationally recognised Human Rights Defender welcomed the observation and stated that the Allahabad High Court has courageously acknowledged a long ignored reality of the legal profession. He noted that young lawyers especially those practising in District Courts form the backbone of grassroots justice delivery yet they are compelled to survive without financial security structured mentorship or institutional support.

Dr Raju further emphasised that the struggle of junior advocates is not an individual failure but a systemic challenge. According to him first generation lawyers face immense pressure due to lack of steady income rising costs of practice and absence of welfare mechanisms. He stressed that such judicial recognition is a step towards meaningful reforms and policy level interventions to ensure dignity sustainability and equal opportunity for young members of the Bar.

He added that a justice system cannot remain strong if those who serve it at the foundational level are left economically vulnerable and unheard. Judicial empathy and constitutional sensitivity as reflected in this observation must translate into long term institutional safeguards for young lawyers across India.

Strong Hashtags

#AllahabadHighCourt

#YoungLawyers

#JuniorAdvocates

#DistrictCourts

#LegalProfession

#LawyersStruggle

#AccessToJustice

#JudicialEmpathy

#LegalReforms

#BarAndBench

#

HumanRights

#DrAnthonyRaju

World Record of Excellence – England

Conferred upon Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court of India
Chairman – Indian National Human Rights Protection Council
Chairman – Bar Federation of India

Date: 16 December 2025
Venue: Bharat Mandapam, Pragati Maidan, New Delhi
Occasion: August Gathering of Hon’ble Ministers, IAS, IPS & Members of Parliament

New Delhi witnessed a moment of national pride as the World Record of Excellence (England) was bestowed upon the Most Respected Hon’ble Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court of India, in recognition of his extraordinary contribution to justice, human rights, constitutional values, and global peace advocacy.

The prestigious honour was presented at Bharat Mandapam, Pragati Maidan, in the presence of an august and distinguished gathering comprising Hon’ble Ministers, senior IAS and IPS officers, Members of Parliament, jurists, diplomats, and eminent civil society leaders.

About Dr. Anthony Raju
Dr. Anthony Raju is a leading Supreme Court Advocate, an internationally acclaimed Human Rights Defender, and a visionary legal reformist. With decades of distinguished service, he is widely respected for his fearless advocacy in constitutional law, criminal justice, human rights protection, and access to justice for the marginalized. His leadership has strengthened institutional accountability and advanced the cause of human dignity both nationally and internationally.

Upon receiving the honour, Dr. Anthony Raju dedicated this prestigious World Record of Excellence to the Nation of India and to all Members of the All India Council of Human Rights, Liberties & Social Justice (AICHLS) and its wings. He reaffirmed his solemn pledge to promote Human Rights, Peace, Rule of Law, and Constitutional Morality globally, emphasizing that justice must remain compassionate, inclusive, and accessible to all.

The recognition stands as a global endorsement of India’s human rights leadership, and of Dr. Raju’s unwavering commitment to justice, peace-building, and democratic values.

Issued by:
Simran Anthony
Executive Director – PR & Governmental Affairs
All India Council of Human Rights, Liberties & Social Justice
???? office@humanrightscouncil.in
???? +91 8588872001 (WhatsApp)

#DrAnthonyRaju #WorldRecordOfExcellence #HumanRightsDefender #SupremeCourtAdvocate
#IndianNationalHumanRightsProtectionCouncil #BarFederationOfIndia
#GlobalPeace #RuleOfLaw #JusticeForAll #HumanRightsLeadership
#humanrightscommission #humanrightscouncilofindia #humanrightscommissionofindia

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/anthonyraju_dranthonyraju-worldrecordofexcellence-humanrightsdefender-activity-7406911389853736960-ipMc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAABnxShYBYa2tDm7sq-K_q7HPhNEOLALYWmY

PRESS RELEASE

15th International Human Rights Summit & Awards 2025

Hosted by the All India Council of Human Rights, Liberties & Social Justice (AICHLS)

Under the Unshaken Leadership of Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court of India & Internationally Accredited Human Rights Defender

10th December 2025 | India Islamic Culture Center Auditorium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi

The 15th International Human Rights Summit & Awards 2025 concluded with great dignity, honour, and global recognition under the unwavering leadership of Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court, an internationally accredited Human Rights Defender celebrated across continents for his extraordinary commitment to justice, peace, and human dignity.

The event witnessed a hall full of august, distinguished dignitaries, marking one of the most powerful gatherings in the history of AICHLS. The summit opened with a beautiful and soulful performance by the students of Mount St. Mary's School, Delhi Cantt, presented under the blessings and guidance of Bro. Tomy Varghese, which received heartfelt applause from the audience.

The prestigious International Human Rights Awards 2025 were presented by eminent national leaders and stalwarts, including:

Lt. Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah, Maj. Gen. Dr. Rajan Kochchar, Dr. N. C. Wadhwa (IAS), Dr. Binny Sareen, Bro. Tomy Varghese, Dr. Manoj Batra, Maj. Rishi Mohan, Maj.(Dr.) MH. Ali Shah, and several other respected personalities who graced the occasion with their inspiring presence.

A deeply spiritual and uplifting message of peace from Syedi Qaidjoher Ezzuddin Bhai Saheb was read out to the gathering, drawing profound appreciation and invoking blessings for harmony and unity.

This year, the most deserving faces from across all walks of life were honoured with the most prestigious International Human Rights Awards, recognising their relentless service to humanity. The awardees included:

Dr. Lakshyaraj Singh Mewar, the 77th custodian of the House of Mewar

Dr. Meenu Walia, Renowned Oncologist

Dr. Lamiya Behn, USA

Dr. Siraz Natawala, London

Ms. Swagatika Patra, London

Dr. Depanker Dass

Ms. Sumera Khan, Well-known Journalist

Meera Parida, Globally Recognised Transgender Activist

Mr. Bibhuti Bhusan Biswal, Senior Journalist

And many more respected achievers who continue to inspire society with their extraordinary contributions.

The evening concluded with a fellowship dinner served with blessings, marking yet another historic milestone for AICHLS in its mission to uphold, protect, and promote human rights across the world.

By

PR, Media Cell

Dr June Ann 

Executive Director PR and Governmental Affairs 

AICHLS 

office@humanrightscouncil.in 

WhatsApp +91 8588872001

गरीब का केस हो तो आधी रात को भी बुला लो – यह कथन भारत के मुख्य न्यायाधीश जस्टिस सूर्यकांत की उस संवेदनशील और संवैधानिक सोच को दर्शाता है, जिसमें न्याय का केंद्र सबसे कमजोर और वंचित व्यक्ति होता है। उनकी यह टिप्पणी न केवल न्यायपालिका की आत्मा को प्रतिबिंबित करती है, बल्कि यह संदेश भी देती है कि न्याय समय, सुविधा या संसाधनों का मोहताज नहीं होना चाहिए।

यह कथन हमें 2015 की उस ऐतिहासिक रात की याद दिलाता है, जब सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने याकूब मेमन मामले में तड़के लगभग तीन बजे अंतिम याचिका पर सुनवाई की थी। उस रात अदालत का खुलना यह सिद्ध करता है कि जब किसी व्यक्ति के जीवन और मौलिक अधिकारों का प्रश्न हो, तब न्यायालय के द्वार कभी बंद नहीं होने चाहिए।

इस संदर्भ में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के अधिवक्ता और अंतरराष्ट्रीय स्तर पर सम्मानित मानवाधिकार रक्षक डॉ. एंथनी राजू का मानना है कि यह टिप्पणी संवैधानिक नैतिकता और समान न्याय के सिद्धांत की सशक्त पुष्टि है। डॉ. एंथनी राजू लंबे समय से गरीब, वंचित और हाशिए पर खड़े लोगों के लिए न्याय की आवाज उठाते रहे हैं। उनका स्पष्ट मत है कि न्याय केवल कानूनी प्रक्रिया नहीं, बल्कि मानवीय संवेदना और समान अवसर का जीवंत रूप होना चाहिए।

डॉ. राजू के अनुसार, जब देश का मुख्य न्यायाधीश यह कहता है कि वह सबसे गरीब वादी के लिए आधी रात तक भी अदालत में बैठ सकता है, तो यह करोड़ों आम नागरिकों के न्याय तंत्र में विश्वास को मजबूत करता है। यह कथन उस भारत की कल्पना को साकार करता है, जहाँ न्याय अमीर और गरीब के बीच भेद नहीं करता, बल्कि केवल सत्य, संविधान और मानव गरिमा को महत्व देता है।

यह विचार निश्चय ही न्यायपालिका के प्रति जनता के विश्वास को नई ऊर्जा देता है और समान न्याय की दिशा में एक मजबूत नैतिक संदेश देता है।

#CJI_SuryaKant

#EqualJusticeForAll

#JusticeForPoor

#DrAnthonyRaju

#HumanRightsDefender

#ConstitutionalMorality

#AccessToJustice

#RuleOfLaw

A Broad Perspective on India’s Criminal Justice System

— Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate, Supreme Court of India, leading criminal Advocate 

Recent high-profile acquittals have reignited an important national conversation on the structural strengths and chronic vulnerabilities of India’s criminal justice system. An acquittal does not equate to moral innocence nor systemic failure—rather, it highlights whether the prosecution could meet the constitutional standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

However, recurring procedural delays, inconsistent investigations, hostile witnesses, and lack of scientific evidence reveal the urgent need for deeper institutional reform. India must prioritise:

✔ Strengthened forensic capabilities

✔ A robust witness protection framework

✔ Time-bound investigation and trial

✔ Accountability for negligent investigation

✔ Training and modernisation across all criminal justice stakeholders

A justice system must be swift, scientific, impartial and fearless. The conversation must remain grounded in constitutional principles—not public emotion—while ensuring fairness both to victims and the accused.

Reform is not optional. It is essential to restoring public trust and upholding the rule of law.

Disclaimer

The views expressed herein are personal legal opinions intended for public awareness and informed discussion. They do not constitute legal advice, nor do they represent the official position of any institution or organisation. Any resemblance to specific cases is purely for contextual understanding within the framework of criminal justice reform.

#CriminalJusticeReform #RuleOfLaw #HumanRights #JudicialReform #FairTrial #Accountability #JusticeForAll #DrAnthonyRaju #AICHLS #humanrightscouncilofindia